Bohemica Olomucensia 2023, 15(1):22-35 | DOI: 10.5507/bo.2023.003

Divergence a konvergence v ruském formalismu a digitálních duchovědách: Moretti, Jakobson, Tyňanov

Petr Steiner

Digital Humanities and Russian Formalism: Darwinism and Anti-Darwinism in Literary History

This paper is addressed Franco Moretti's provocative application of the Darwinian evolutionary model based on the divergence of biological species and their survival through natural selection to literary history. This approach was juxtaposed against the ideas of two leading Russian Formalists, Iurii Tynianov and Roman Jakobson, whose explanation of linguistic/literary change was programmatically anti-Darwinian, making conversion (conceived, though, in a particular way) the cornerstone of their respective historiographies. In doing so, they were reacting to the project of historical poetics advanced by the 19th-century Russian Positivist philologist Aleksandr Veselovskii, whose stated goal was to trace the morphological divergences of texts across time and space. The dichotomy "conversion-diversion," my paper illustrated, is not limited to criticism alone. The same frame of reference was invoked in the late 1950s in a famous dispute between the behavioral psychologist B. F. Skinner and the father of the transformational generative grammar, Noam Chomsky, about language acquisition and subsequently in their heated polemics about the human subject's autonomy triggered by the publication of Skinner's book Beyond Freedom and Dignity (1971).

Keywords: literary history; Darwinism; anti-Darwinism; causality; teleology; digital humanities; Formalism; Chomsky; Jakobson; Moretti; Skinner; Veselovskii; Tynianov

Published: September 1, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Steiner, P. (2023). Digital Humanities and Russian Formalism: Darwinism and Anti-Darwinism in Literary History. Bohemica Olomucensia, 15(1), 22-35. doi: 10.5507/bo.2023.003
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)

    • References

    1. Herman, Edvard S. a Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.
    2. Chomsky, Noam. 1959. "Review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior." In Language 35(1), s. 26-58. Go to original source...
    3. Chomsky, Noam. 1971. "The Case Against B. F. Skinner." In New York Review of Books, 30.12.1971. Cit. dle: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1971/12/30/the-case-against-bf-skinner/
    4. Chomsky, Noam. 1972. "Psychology and Ideology." In Cognition 1(1), s. 11-46. Go to original source...
    5. Jakobson, Roman. 1962a. "Principes de phonologie historique." In Selected Writings, sv. 1, Phonological Studies. Týž. Mouton: The Hague, s. 202-220.
    6. Jakobson, Roman. 1962b. "Remarques sur l'évolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves." In Selected Writings, sv. 1, Phonological Studies. Týž. Mouton: The Hague, s. 7-166.
    7. Jakobson, Roman. 1995. "Základy českého verše." In Poetická funkce. Týž. Přel. Miroslav Červenka, Milada Chlíbcová a Terezie Pokorná. Jinočany: H & H, s. 157-248.
    8. Jakobson, Roman a Tyňanov, Jurij. 1995. "Problémy zkoumání literatury a jazyka." In Poetická funkce. Roman Jakobson. Přel. Miroslav Červenka, Milada Chlíbcová a Terezie Pokorná. Jinočany: H & H, s. 34-36.
    9. Kundera, Milan. 1989. Žert. Toronto: Sixty-Eight Publishers.
    10. Moretti, Franco. 1988. "On Literary Evolution." In Signs Taken for Wonders: Essays in the Sociology of Literary Forms. Týž. Přel. Susan Fischer, David Forgacs a David Miller. London: Verso.
    11. Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. London: Verso.
    12. Moretti, Franco. 2014. "Stromy." In Grafy, mapy, stromy: Abstraktní modely literární historie. Týž. Přel. Olga Čaplyginová. Praha: Karolinum, s. 69-94.
    13. Mullen, Andrew. 2009. "The Propaganda Model after 20 Years: Interview with Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky." In Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 6(2), s. 22. Go to original source...
    14. de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1996. Kurs obecné lingvistiky. Přel. František Čermák. Praha: Academia.
    15. Skinner, Burrhus Frederic. 1957. Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    16. Skinner, Burrhus Frederic. 1971. Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    17. Tyňanov, Jurij. 1988a. "Literární fakt." In Literární fakt. Týž. Přel. Ladislav Zadražil. Praha: Odeon, s. 125-142.
    18. Tyňanov, Jurij. 1988b. "O literární evoluci." In Literární fakt. Týž. Přel. Ladislav Zadražil. Praha: Odeon, s. 189-201.
    19. Tyňanov, Jurij. 1988c. "Veršové formy Někrasovovy." In Literární fakt. Týž. Přel. Ladislav Zadražil. Praha: Odeon, s. 303-315.
    20. Tyňanov, Jurij. 1988d. "Óda jako řečnický žánr." In Literární fakt. Týž. Přel. Ladislav Zadražil. Praha: Odeon, s. 20-49.
    21. Veselovskij, Aleksandr. 1940. "O metode i zadačach istorii literatury kak nauki." In Istoričeskaja poetika. Týž. Leningrad: Chudožestvennaja literatura, s. 41-52.
    22. Wallace, David Foster. 1993. "E Unibus Pluram: Television and US Fiction." In The Review of Contemporary Fiction 13(2), s. 151-194.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content