Bohemica Olomucensia 2025, 17(1):12-33 | DOI: 10.5507/bo.2025.001
The manifesto published by Literární skupina (Literary Group) in 1922 attempted to synthesize and reinterpret numerous concepts appearing in the critical discourse of the early 1920s; among them, classicism and primitivism represented the desire for a new form of social poetry. These two directives were present in the young criticism as lessons of simplification and a sense of reality, as evidenced by the texts of Karel Teige and other critics in the circle of Devětsil. As a part of discussion with Devětsil on new/proletarian art, František Götz and Literární skupina promulgated the synthesis of classicism and primitivism in the manifesto. But subsequent texts of Götz and others demonstrated that this synthesis was only chimerical: there was no programmatic aim to revive the tradition (and classicism had no basis outside of it), while primitivism was the vivid reality of poetic writing.
Received: December 5, 2024; Revised: December 5, 2024; Accepted: February 4, 2025; Published: December 31, 2025 Show citation
Go to original source...This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.