Bohemica Olomucensia 2025, 17(3):130-143 | DOI: 10.5507/bo.2025.027
This study follows previous systematic interest in (not only) literary diaries of Vladimír Novotný, however, concerning literary diaries, also authors as: Rudolf Suchý, Zdeněk Kožmín, Petr Kukal, or from foreign literary production for example Rudolf Dilong. The text is concerned with the last two diaristic books of Vladimír Novotný - Týdny v tusculu (Weeks in Tusculum) and Týdny a dny (Weeks and Days). It draws on previously acquired knowledge utilized in reviews concerning Novotný's work, the study focusing on fictional/literary ego-document, and additional (unfortunately not extensive) critical response to Novotný's literary diaries. This study offers views on Novotný's work distinct from M. Šedivý's and J. Lukavec's with whose critical responses does not corelate. The analysis and the interpretation of Weeks in Tusculum and Weeks and Days focus on artistic qualities, including dissimilarities with previously written literary diaries of Novotný (which could be, considering author's views and narrative tectonics, divided into Little Lines and Post-little Lines). The aim of this study is to express disagreement with contemporary literary criticism concerning quality of Novotný's work.
Received: December 7, 2024; Revised: February 14, 2025; Accepted: December 31, 2025; Published: July 16, 2026 Show citation
Go to original source...This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.