Bohemica Olomucensia 2020, 12(3):44-52 | DOI: 10.5507/bo.2020.033

Vilikovského román (znova) v postmodernom duchu

Igor Hochel
Katedra slovenského jazyka a literatúry, Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre

Klíčová slova: Slovak post-modern literature, semantic fields, double identity, writer and character, imagined reality, post-modern hope and scepticism, resistance towards the reader

VILIKOVSKÝ'S NOVEL (ONCE MORE) IN A POST-MODERN SPIRIT

In the introduction, the study discusses why the prose writer Pavel Vilikovský is a key personality of Slovak post-modern literature. Afterwards, attention is turned to his novel Krásna strojvodkyňa, krutá vojvodkyňa [Beautiful Engineer, Cruel Duchess]. Semantic fields of the nouns and adjectives included in the title are explained and connected with the semantics of the novel as a whole. The study observes that the discussed text is a sort of collage comprised of multiple levels or layers. The first part of the text consists of what is essentially a banal story of Ivan whose marriage is going through a crisis, which is why he finds himself a mistress. However, this story remains without a conclusion, which may irritate a hypothetical naive reader. The author's focus shifts to a writer who - in a manner of speaking - has a double identity. On one hand, there is the identity of a creator with a "noble purpose" and on the other there is the "ordinary citizen" who must face practical matters of everyday life. These two identities are in conflict with each other, and Ivan - the original protagonist of the novel - is involved as well. Vilikovský makes use the bizarre and of the absurd. The key word of the novel is the adjective imagined. The stories are imagined, and the characters are imagined. It is as if reality in and of itself did not exist, but it is only as we imagine. Thus, even what is written cannot be taken entirely seriously. One can see post-modern scepticism in it. Or perhaps hope instead? The novel also considerably resists an intellectual and patient reader who may become confused. However, it can ultimately tell him surprisingly much not only about the nature and futility of writer's craft, but also about his (own) life, the complexity of interpersonal relationships and the absurdity of both individual and societal existence.

Zveřejněno: 1. září 2020  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hochel, I. (2020). Vilikovského román (znova) v postmodernom duchu. Bohemica Olomucensia12(3), 44-52. doi: 10.5507/bo.2020.033
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. HAMADA, Milan. (1997). "Postmodernistický existencialista P. V."; SME, 13. 2., príloha Fórum
  2. ŽILKA, Tibor. (1997). "Existenciálna a palimpsestová próza"; in idem, Od moderny k postmoderne (Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa), s. 71-91
  3. ŽILKA, Tibor. (2000). Postmoderná semiotika textu (Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa)

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), která umožňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.